Wednesday, 11 June 2014

The media loves experts

I’m sure you’ve noticed that each time the media does a story on rising fuel costs, they talk to someone from the local motoring association, and when interest rates move we hear from a representative of the finance sector.

The media loves experts – and whatever the topic, there’s an expert that can add some flavour and dimension to the story.

You are an expert!

As someone with knowledge about your field, you have information that is valuable to others. But is the media coming to you for comment when your industry is in the news?

If they are not, it’s because they don’t know you. Never feel you have nothing to offer, because your opinion is important to someone.

I am often asked to comment within the media in my role as a public relations strategist who is considered an ‘expert’ in issues and reputation management. I’ve provided my thoughts on issues as diverse as the Lance Armstrong fall from grace, a hospital’s legionnaire outbreak and the Malaysian Government’s response to missing flight MH370.

Maybe you’re in a field that doesn’t deal with the general public, yet your opinion may be valuable to industry or trade media.

Remember that the media must develop a story. They can’t just report the facts because this is too bland – they need more. They require the facts behind the facts, the thinking behind the facts behind the facts, and what this means for the future. They want to know how the story impacts the country, the local community and anyone else that may be affected.

When you or your company or organisation is viewed as the expert, it increases profile, credibility and often, revenue. People want to deal with experts.

If you’ve never thought of positioning you and your company to provide expert opinion to the media, here are three simple steps:

1. Summarise the areas in which you have expertise. For example if you are a law firm, make a note of your speciality areas like family law or franchising.

2. Make a list of the media that would be seen by your ‘publics’ (your stakeholders and potential markets) and find their contact numbers. These could be local, industry or national media outlets, depending on your field and market.

3. Do a short ‘media alert’ or just an email note, letting them know you are available to speak on issues that relate to your industry or product. Include a few suggested topics and some points about your background and expertise.

The fine line between pleasure and pain – staying in the pleasure zone

In this new media world, companies and organisations tread a fine line between great PR and a disaster.

Some of the world’s largest corporations have created what they thought were brilliant social media PR stunts only to see them spectacularly backfire.

In many other cases, something said or done with little thought has been twisted out of context by the media, resulting in adverse publicity.

The problem with negative media is that in today’s instant and digital media world, yesterday’s stories are no longer “todays fish and chip wrappers” – they are on the internet for all to see for a very long time!

It is a foolish organisation that has no media policy or safeguards in place to ensure that what they say and do publicly is checked and filtered to minimise damage.

Yet I am continually surprised at how many companies and organisation are in fact – this foolish.

Many PR crises or potentially damaging public issues can be traced back to a specific point that birthed the issue. If at that point the organisation had said or done something differently, they would not be trying to kill negative media stories and dealing with a cascade of abuse via email and social media.

Often they cannot see the mistake they made - considering the initial act or words quite innocuous – simply because they are not thinking a step ahead.

Now, more than ever before - because we live in the world of instant and social media where every person has the power to publicise - we must consider the future ramifications of our current actions.

Every decision we make, every comment we state, every action we take – should be prefaced by the question, “What if this was to be made public?”
Call it paranoia at your peril. It’s the new media world and smart organisations think a step ahead.
It’s this sort of forward thinking that would have stopped the infamous phone call from Sydney radio station 2Day FM to the hospital treating the Duchess of Cambridge (Read previous blog HERE).

But we only hear the high profile cases. There are countless small to large businesses, people and non-profit organisations each year that suffer due to reputational damage caused by a PR crisis that could have been avoided.

More concerning, is that many that escape the spotlight are more lucky than smart. I’ve heard countless business people make racist, sexist and just plain stupid comments in public forums; years ago these would carry no public risk, but in today’s hypersensitive media environment these comments are ticking time bombs.

While comments like these are reasonably obvious to most of us, many actions that lead to public pain are simply careless, resulting not from rudeness but ignorance.

A seemingly innocent comment in an internal newsletter, a naive response to a media enquiry, a connection with a controversial person or company, an advertising campaign that uses a term offensive to people in Uzbekistan……

It’s impossible to predict every outcome in every situation, but from my observations, most PR disasters are preventable by being aware of the new media world, thinking ahead and having a system in place to filter all outgoing public material.

Consulting with a corporate PR professional from outside your company or organisation is also an important part of the filtering process. Those on the inside are too familiar with your industry and too used to what’s said and done; they will miss the risks.

Great publicity is pleasurable – it brings profile, business and revenue. But be aware of the fine line, across which lies a world of pain, and put measures in place to ensure you don’t cross it.

Monday, 9 June 2014

It’s time for news media to rise above social media level

The reporting in mainstream media of a simple mispronunciation by Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott reflects poorly on journalism.
Australian and Canadian PMs

Any reasonable person (irrespective of political views) understands that each of us – and even more so a national leader who is giving endless speeches and media interviews – will from time to time mispronounce a word.

This is not news, nor should it ever be. No serious journalist should treat it as such.

In this case, the Prime Minister had just said the word “Canadian” in the correct context, and then immediately corrected himself after the mispronunciation.

The fact that I am even explaining this is absurd. That some people on Twitter seriously drew a connection between this and the Prime Minister’s competency is ridiculous.

But most nonsensical of all is the reporting of this truly insignificant act in the mainstream media.

It has become commonplace recently to write a “news story” – and I use that term loosely – on nothing more than reporting what a bunch of people say on Twitter. This is not only lazy journalism, but a reflection of the current trend to 'dumb down' the news.

Too often, proper news gathering is being reduced to the immature level of much of social media, which thrives on feigned outrage, harsh criticism and polarising opinions.

Some media stories are nothing more than a copy and paste of people’s online remarks, with no vetting of who these 'people' even are.

Meanwhile, every day there are events, actions and comments by people, companies and organisations across the country that directly affect the lives of everyday Australians. These stories are often ignored.

My hope is that journalists will start to leave social media in that forum, and focus on mature reporting.

Thursday, 28 November 2013

Branding is not only for companies – what about you?

How are you developing your personal brand?

As many Australian students graduating high school and university plan their future career paths, there is something else they need to be working on – their personal brand.

The social and digital media age has changed the dynamics of branding. Words like marketing, branding and positioning were once associated primarily with the corporate world, though extended to celebrities and other high profile individuals.

Yet now, every one of us has a “brand” whether we like it or not. Many people have not grasped this important concept, leading to a failure to build value into their personal brand and even worse, a failure to protect their brand’s reputation.

A simple Google search will inform you of your brand’s currency. It will showcase who you are, what you’ve achieved and in many cases, what you believe. It will reveal your thoughts, your adventures and your actions in words, photos and even in video (as the new Australian senator-elect representing the Motorist Party discovered!).

Your brand is worth protecting because we have reached the stage where your digital footprint will not be easily erased by the tide of time. The way you allow your brand to be moulded now will influence your future; it will affect your road to success.

School and university leavers in 2013 and beyond have a tougher road than those of past generations. Youthful attitudes and actions haven’t changed – young people have always pushed the limits – but the level of transparency has.

Recently ‘schoolies’ on Queensland’s Gold Coast were warned that their actions, if posted on social media, could affect their job opportunities in the future. These warnings are wise, but it goes beyond missing out on a job; every photo and every post is creating their personal brand.

Your brand can determine your job prospects, your income level, your relationships, your friends – it tells the world who you are and why you are worth the time, the money, the investment and the trust.

It’s vital that personal reputations are protected, but at the same time, smart people use the tools available to them to sell their brand. A good presence on mainstream sites like LinkedIn, blogs that highlight professional knowledge and expertise, and injecting yourself into the right online forums and conversations, are smart ways to build a strong personal brand.

Conversely, those whose problems are aired publicly - whether they be political figures, business people, those charged with criminal offences or people engulfed in some form of controversy - will see their brand defined by these events wherever they go on the globe. There is nowhere to hide!

Every one of us should be aware of the value of our personal brand. Those embarking on their careers now have an advantage, in that they have time to build theirs.

Three tips to building a strong personal brand:

1. Promote yourself with enthusiasm and humility. Use your strengths and personal expertise to define your brand online, through forums, blogs and social media.

2. Stay focused on your message. This simple public relations key is just as important for individual brands as corporate identities. The more you talk about your message consistently, the more it will resonate.

3. Protect your reputation by being very careful what you post online. Ensure all settings on personal social media sites are private. If you use social media sites like Facebook for personal use, make sure you only “friend” people you know personally. Keep business and personal contacts and issues separate.

Sunday, 3 November 2013

Abraham Lincoln – public relations guru

“Public sentiment is everything” – Abraham Lincoln

These words were uttered during what was reported to be an otherwise unremarkable debating performance with a political opponent in the midst of the American slavery era.

Just over 160 years later, the words still ring true, whether it be for politicians, corporations, activists, charities or anyone else that relies on public support.

The more complete quote is as follows:

"In this and like communities, public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment, nothing can fail; without it nothing can succeed. Consequently he who moulds public sentiment, goes deeper than he who enacts statutes or pronounces decisions. He makes statutes and decisions possible or impossible to be executed.”

Of course gauging public sentiment was a different process in the mind 1800s. There was no internet, no Twitter, no blogs, no talkback radio - not even television!

This proverb comes to mind - “the more things change, the more they stay the same”. While technology changes the way we communicate, the message – and the importance of the message to influence our ‘publics’ - remains the same.

It proves the power of public relations – the ability to relate to your public. It highlights the need to consider public reaction before – not after – decisions have been made.

It confirms the need to control the conversation, ensuring that your core messages are being heard and not drowned out.

It emphasises the link between success and good PR, and alternatively, failure and a lack of PR.

The instant and social media world of which we are a part in 2013 and beyond, makes it both easier and harder to influence public sentiment.

It is easier in the respect that there are more channels than ever before for your message. It is harder in that these channels are accessible by the masses with a myriad of different backgrounds and opinions, making controlling the message much more difficult.

There are three things every company, every public figure and even every small business must do in order to succeed in the world of instant and social media:
  1. Remember the words of Lincoln – “Public sentiment is everything” and identify your publics. Who do you rely on for your success?
  2. Actively engage your publics with your key messages, ensuring that you have a relationship with them. Don’t consider communications as an “add-on”. It should be a core part of your strategy.
  3. Be prepared when something goes wrong that could cause public sentiment to change. Be careful with what you say and where you say it, as anything can go viral globally at the click of a mouse button! Protect your reputation and have a plan to regain control of your message when needed.

Thursday, 26 September 2013

Federal Labor is still failing the public relations test

Seriously? You'd think they won!

At the core of public relations is the ability to understand what your ‘publics’ require.

Successful companies meet the needs of their customers by monitoring customer feedback and developing avenues to engage on a regular basis.

Nowhere is public engagement more important than the field of politics. As soon as a politician ceases to read the public mood, they are politically dead.

While all sides of Australian politics are guilty of just that on a semi-regular basis, the current state and attitude of the federal Labor Party is possibly the most glaring example I’ve seen of a complete failure to read public opinion.

From the bizarre concession / victory speech by Kevin Rudd to comments by the current Labor leadership contenders and current acting leader, it is clear that all within the parliamentary Labor Party have completely failed to accept that the Australian people turfed them out so resolutely, and have deluded themselves as to the reasons.

It took a frustrated Bob Hawke on election night to remind Labor that they had in fact lost. He seemed puzzled and even angry with the cheerful air of victory within the party. His reaction revealed the gulf in terms of political perception and leadership between the Hawke / Keating era and almost everyone who has led the Labor party since.

For all of her obvious talent and skills, former Prime Minister Julia Gillard lives in the land of delusion.

Since the announcement of the carbon tax, she refused to accept that she lost the trust of the Australian people, refused to concede that she was heading for a landslide of prodigious proportions and blamed her struggles on….being a woman!

Remarkably, over the last two days, she has given two interviews lamenting that all people cared about were her “shoes and clothes”.

If she for a moment poked her heard out of the bubble and spoke to mainstream Australia (as opposed to the twitterverse) she’d understand that her loss of support had nothing to do with her gender and everything to do with her performance as PM.

Maybe it’s easier for her to blame sexism, just like it’s easier for many companies to blame the customer or a myriad of other factors for poor results rather than accept the cold, hard truth – it’s about performance.

Australians rejected her policies. Full stop. They stopped trusting her and her government and therefore stopped listening. To suggest she was attacked politically for her gender is insulting to the many women who succeed everyday in Australian political, corporate and community life. It also baffles the majority of Australians, actually confirming their opinion that she didn't understand them or their priorities.

But it’s not just Julia Gillard who is failing to grasp the public’s thinking. Collectively, federal Labor MPs can’t admit they got it wrong. Despite one of the biggest losses in history, they refuse to concede that Australia rejected the carbon tax, the continual policy-on-the-run, the broken promises of the early Rudd years and the arrogance displayed for so long.

They also got it wrong about Tony Abbott, who seems to be quite in tune with the feelings of mainstream Australia. He has focused on what’s important to people – the first rule of public relations and certainly the first rule of politics.

I’ve dealt with enough political staffers to know that many of them relish the bubble-world of politics. What is important to them hardly rates in the real world. A win on the floor of parliament excites the MP, the staff and the press gallery but doesn’t register in the suburbs.

While Labor continues to blame everything except their performance for their loss, while they pretend it was about personality, while they act like they won the election, while they refuse to accept that the people voted decisively to change government – they’ll be in the political wilderness.

Whether in politics, business or community work, relating and listening to your ‘publics’ is the key to success. 

Note: This blog is written from a public relations, not a political viewpoint

Wednesday, 25 September 2013

Another day – another social media drama!

This time it’s British airline ‘easyJet’ in the firing line as a passenger alleges the airline tried to prevent him from boarding a flight after an innocuous tweet about a delay. 

Read the article HERE

While the airline denies this, the passenger in question – a university law lecturer – stands by his account.

It’s another example of social media being the ‘world’s biggest complaints department’ and how willing people are to share negative comments.

The passenger has only around 2500 twitter followers (not sure how many he had before the infamous tweet) yet his original tweet complaining about the airline was retweeted over 3500 times. Of course it’s now made mainstream media across the world.

A simple action by a gate clerk has created a social media storm, forcing the company to use valuable resources to sort it out. Of course it won’t have any long-term effect but it is an unnecessary and costly distraction.

I’ve said this ad nauseam - companies still don’t take the new social and instant media world seriously. It should be drummed into every staff member that the slightest issue can explode and measures should be taken to ensure any complaint is resolved.

Of course companies should also be response-ready because it’s impossible to predict every situation, but so many issues that do arise could have been prevented with foresight, planning and the right advice.